Push Admin

1997 court decision could delay people's initiative push: retired SC justice

Article (news)

ABS-CBN News

<div class="embed-wrap"><figure data-feedback="fb:likes,fb:comments"><img alt="A woman uses her phone outside the Commission on Elections (Comelec) building in Quezon City on October 14, 2021. Jonathan Cellona, ABS-CBN News/File." src="https://sa.kapamilya.com/absnews/abscbnnews/media/2021/news/10/20/20211014-maringph-benguet-clearing-operation-cp022935000.jpg"/><figcaption>A woman uses her phone outside the Commission on Elections (Comelec) building in Quezon City on October 14, 2021. <em>Jonathan Cellona, ABS-CBN News/File.</em></figcaption></figure></div><p>MANILA — The renewed attempt to amend the 1987 Constitution through people&#x27;s initiative will have to settle whether it should be allowed at all, a former Supreme Court associate justice said Sunday, referring to a 1997 decision that the law allowing it only applies to legislation.</p><p>Speaking on TeleRadyo Serbisyo, retired SC Associate Justice Adolfo Azcuna said the court ruled in Santiago v. Comelec that Republic Act No. 6735, or the Initiative and Referendum Act, is insufficient for constitutional amendments.</p><p>&quot;Yung batas na &#x27;yun ay hindi puwedeng basehan para sa people&#x27;s initiative dahil may pagkukulang,&quot; Azcuna said, noting that RA 6735 does not prescribe what a petition to amend the Constitution would look like and what it should say.</p><p>&quot;Iba ang provision, iba ang patakaran kung constitution ay involved,&quot; he said.</p><figure class="op-interactive"><iframe allow="autoplay; fullscreen" frameBorder="0" height="100%" id="ivsplayer01" scrolling="no" src="https://player.ivideosmart.com/ivsplayer/v4/dist/html/iframe-src.html?iframeid=ivsplayer01&amp;key=e8c22c015ca9eafa76f1e3edfa03c603&amp;spid=3001339&amp;vid=2929987" width="100%"></iframe></figure><div class="iwantbar">Watch more News on <a href="https://www.iwanttfc.com/#!/browse/Genres/News/tag_id_genres/id_news" target="_blank">iWantTFC</a></div><p>The 1997 decision was on a petition by <a href="https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/01/11/24/pirma-heads-admits-goal-to-dilute-senate-vote-in-cha-cha">People’s Initiative for Reform Modernization and Action (PIRMA)</a>, which has revived the campaign in 2024.</p><p>The Supreme Court, in Santiago v. Comelec, said the poll body &quot;should be permanently enjoined from entertaining or taking cognizance of any petition&quot; on people&#x27;s initiative for constitutional amendment until a &quot;sufficient&quot; law is passed for it. </p><p>It also urged Congress to pass a law &quot;to provide for the implementation of the right of the people under that system.&quot;</p><p>The current signature campaign seeks to amend the 1987 Constitution to specify that Congress will vote jointly on constitutional amendments and revisions.</p><p>Azcuna, a member of the constitutional commission that drafted it, said that section was meant for a unicameral system and that delegates failed to edit it for a bicameral system, which is what the Philippines has now.</p><ul class="op-related-articles">	<li><a href="https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/01/13/24/peoples-initiative-to-remove-consistent-roadblock-to-cha-cha-garbin">People&#x27;s initiative to remove consistent roadblock to cha-cha: Garbin</a></li></ul><div><strong>CHANCE TO REVIEW SANTIAGO V. COMELEC</strong></div><p>He said that the current people&#x27;s initiative campaign could be a chance for the Supreme Court to review Santiago v. Comelec, noting that 10 justices in the decision on Lambino v. Comelec — another attempt at people&#x27;s initiative in 2006, disagreed that RA 6735 is insufficient.</p><p>Azcuna said the court did not go into Santiago v. Comelec in 2006 because it was clear that the Lambino petition was for constitutional revision, which cannot be done through people&#x27;s initiative.</p><p>He added that the opinions of the 10 justices on RA 6735 were &quot;ober dictum&quot;, or made in passing, and did not reverse Santiago v. Comelec.</p><p>&quot;Sa palagay ko, yung resolution na &#x27;yun ay hindi pagbabago ng Santiago decision,&quot; he said.</p><p>He added that the petition can be brought to court when the Comelec accepts and processes it or if it refuses to do so.</p><figure class="op-interactive"><iframe allow="autoplay; fullscreen" frameBorder="0" height="100%" id="ivsplayer01" scrolling="no" src="https://player.ivideosmart.com/ivsplayer/v4/dist/html/iframe-src.html?iframeid=ivsplayer01&amp;key=e8c22c015ca9eafa76f1e3edfa03c603&amp;spid=3001339&amp;vid=2926403" width="100%"></iframe></figure><div class="iwantbar">Watch more News on <a href="https://www.iwanttfc.com/#!/browse/Genres/News/tag_id_genres/id_news" target="_blank">iWantTFC</a></div><div><strong>COMELEC: WE ARE BOUND TO ACCEPT PETITIONS</strong></div><p>Comelec Chairman George Garcia, in a separate interview, said that the poll body has a constitutional duty to accept and process petitions filed before it.</p><p>&quot;Tatanggapin namin basta magbayad ng filing fee,&quot; he said, adding the Comelec will then have to check whether any petition is sufficient in form and substance before tasking its regional offices to verify the signatures on the petition.</p><p>Garcia, a lawyer, said that Comelec has taken the position that it can accept petitions for people&#x27;s initative because of the decision in Lambino v. Comelec.</p><p>The commission issued Resolution 10650 in January 2020 setting rules and regulations for petitions through RA 6735.</p><p>Under those rules, the full text of the proposed amendment to the Constitution must be written on the petition or should be included as an attachment.</p><p>Petitioners must also include the reason for the proposed amendment and a short summary of the proposition &quot;at the top of every page of the petition.&quot;</p><p>They must also affirm that signatories understood the proposal and knew that signing meant approval of the proposal and consent to the filing of the petition.</p><p>Garcia stressed that expenses for these petitions cannot come from government funds and that signatures can be invalidated if it is proven that they were done in exchange for money from public funds.</p><p>&quot;Hindi po [ito] vote-buying sapagkat hindi naman boto technically itong pirma, pero pupuwede po kasi — lalo&#x27;t yung ginagamit na pera ay pera ng bayan, &#x27;yan po ay Anti-Graft,&quot; he also said.</p><p>Government agencies, including the <a href="https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/01/09/24/doh-distances-self-from-charter-change-talk">Department of Health</a> and <a href="https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/01/12/24/dswd-denies-cash-aid-linked-to-charter-change-push">Department of Social Welfare and Development</a>, have denied reports that aid programs are being used to convince voters to support the people&#x27;s initiative campaign.</p>

Santiago v. Comelec was on a petition by People’s Initiative for Reform Modernization and Action (PIRMA), which has revived the campaign in 2024.