Push Admin

Trump again asks Supreme Court to block subpoena for his tax records

Article (news)

Charlie Savage, The New York Times

<div class="embed-wrap"><figure data-feedback="fb:likes,fb:comments"><img src="http://sa.kapamilya.com/absnews/abscbnnews/media/2020/tnyt/10/14/trump-taxes.jpg"/><figcaption>President Donald Trump at a campaign rally at the at the Orlando Sanford International Airport in Sanford, Fla., Oct. 12, 2020. Personal lawyers for Trump asked the Supreme Court on Tuesday, Oct. 13, 2020, to put on hold a ruling that the Manhattan district attorney may gain access to financial records, saying that Trump would be irreparably harmed if prosecutors obtained his tax returns and other data before the case was fully litigated. Doug Mills, The New York Times</figcaption></figure></div>WASHINGTON — Personal lawyers for US President Donald Trump, seeking to appeal their case to the Supreme Court for the second time in less than a year, asked the justices Tuesday to delay a ruling that would allow the Manhattan district attorney to obtain Trump’s financial records.In a 38-page “emergency” application, Trump’s legal team told the court that a US District Court judge was wrong to rule that the prosecutor, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., had a legal right to subpoena the materials — and that an appeals court panel in New York was wrong to uphold that ruling this month.“Allowing this deeply flawed ruling to stand, especially given the prominence of this case, will needlessly sow confusion where none presently exists,” wrote Trump’s legal team, including William S. Consovoy and Jay Sekulow. “The decision is indisputably wrong.”The request for Supreme Court intervention had been expected since a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled Oct. 7 that Vance could use a grand jury to obtain Trump’s financial records, rejecting the president’s arguments that the request was overly broad and amounted to politically motivated harassment. Vance is a Democrat.“Grand juries must necessarily paint with a broad brush,” the judges wrote, adding: “None of the president’s allegations, taken together or separately, are sufficient to raise a plausible inference that the subpoena was issued out of malice or an intent to harass.”The request for intervention marks a return for the case. In July, the Supreme Court ruled, 7-2, that the fact that Trump was the sitting president did not make him absolutely immune from criminal investigation, as his legal team had argued.“No citizen, not even the president, is categorically above the common duty to produce evidence when called upon in a criminal proceeding,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority in that decision.However, the Supreme Court left Trump with other arguments to make before lower courts, including that the subpoena was too broad or issued in bad faith. Trump’s legal team has been trying out those arguments without success before lower courts — although the litigation has consumed months, continuing to run out the clock before the election.Breaking with precedent and norms, Trump refused to release his tax returns when he sought the presidency in 2016. In 2019, House Democrats and Vance separately subpoenaed the documents from the president’s accountants, and he has been fighting them ever since.Separately, however, The New York Times obtained access to more than two decades of tax return data of Trump and the Trump Organization and late last month began publishing a series of investigative articles about what they showed.The Times found, among other things, that despite Trump’s boasting about a huge income, his business empire has actually suffered huge losses, which he has leveraged to avoid paying income taxes in 11 of the 18 years The Times scrutinized; he paid just $750 in taxes in 2016 and 2017. It also showed that the IRS was investigating the legitimacy of a $72.9 million refund he claimed in 2010, which he may be forced to pay back with interest, and that in the next four years, more than $300 million in loans for which he is personally responsible will come due.The records also revealed numerous other issues with potential tax law implications, like a highly unusual $21 million payment from a Las Vegas hotel that Trump co-owns that was routed through other Trump companies at a time he was raising cash for his 2016 campaign, and the income his properties have received from people seeking favorable action from the government and access to him when he visits those properties.While it is clear that Vance is overseeing an investigation about Trump and his business practices, he has not publicly detailed the precise focus on the inquiry. Still, court filings by prosecutors suggest they are looking at potential crimes that include tax and insurance fraud and falsification of business records. Their subpoena to Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, also seeks records and communications with the president.The filing to the Supreme Court by Trump’s legal team Tuesday does not mention The Times’ recent reporting and treats the tax returns as if their contents are still entirely confidential.Among the arguments that his lawyers made was that the president would be harmed not only by the records falling into the hands of prosecutors — who are generally required to keep subpoenaed material secret under grand jury rules — but also by the risk that they would become public, like if Vance were to put data from them in an indictment.“If the president’s records are disclosed publicly (as thus could happen even without a grand-jury breach), then the harm will not only be irreparable. It will be case-mooting,” Trump’s lawyers wrote, calling that a particularly compelling justification to stay the order for Mazars to turn over the materials while they continue to fight the case.

Personal lawyers for US President Donald Trump, seeking to appeal their case to the Supreme Court for the second time in less than a year, asked the justices Tuesday to delay a ruling that would allow the Manhattan district attorney to obtain Trump’s financial records.

Personal lawyers for US President Donald Trump, seeking to appeal their case to the Supreme Court for the second time in less than a year, asked the justices Tuesday to delay a ruling that would allow the Manhattan district attorney to obtain Trump’s financial records.

Trump again asks Supreme Court to block subpoena for his tax records

News

Entertainment

Lifestyle

Sports

Metro.Style

More

Traffic

Manila

Horoscope

Overseas

Trump again asks Supreme Court to block subpoena for his tax records

Charlie Savage,

The New York Times

Published Oct 15, 2020 12:16 AM PHT

Read More:

Donald Trump

tax records

The New York Times

ABS-CBN is the leading media and entertainment company in the Philippines, offering quality content across TV, radio, digital, and film. Committed to public service and promoting Filipino values, ABS-CBN continues to inspire and connect audiences worldwide.

Corporate

Investors

Governance

International Distribution

Corporate

Governance

Investors

International Distribution

NPC Seal of Registration

Privacy Policy

AI Policy

Terms of Service

Advertise with Us

© 2025 ABS-CBN Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

NPC Seal of Registration

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

AI Policy

Advertise with Us

© 2025 ABS-CBN Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

NPC Seal of Registration

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

AI Policy

Advertise with Us

© 2025 ABS-CBN Corporation. All Rights Reserved.