Push Admin

The Supreme Court building in Manila. April 21, 2014. Jonathan Cellona, ABS-CBN News.

Article (news)

Adrian Ayalin

ABS-CBN News

<p>MANILA - The Supreme Court has ruled that demotion, verbal abuse and indifferent behavior by an employer that forces an employee to quit constitute constructive illegal dismissal.</p><p>In the decision of the 2nd Division promulgated on April 3, 2024, Toyota Quezon Avenue, Inc (TQAI) and its officials were held solidarily liable for the illegal dismissal of petitioner Jonathan Bartolome.</p><p>The court ordered the company and its officials namely Lincoln Lim, Esteban Dela Paz, Jr. and Josefina De Jesus to pay Bartolome his full wages from 2016 up to the date of decision, as well as separation pay amounting to one month per year of service, commissions totaling P83,341.80 and moral and exemplary damages amounting to P70,000.</p><p>In 2015, Bartolome was suspended for seven days due to frequent absences and during a meeting with management, he brought his sibling who acted as his legal counsel.</p><p>The court noted that during the meeting, the president publicly humiliated Bartolome for bringing his sibling. At one point, his manager turned down his attempt to process a sale and his new boss explicitly asked if he planned on resigning.</p><p>The court also noted that because of the events and the hostile work environment, Bartolome resigned in 2016 but when he asked for his clearance, he was supposedly treated like a criminal and harassed for no reason.</p><div><span class="fr-video fr-deletable fr-fvc fr-dvb fr-draggable" contenteditable="false" draggable="true"><iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5xM3i7HdId4?&amp;wmode=opaque&amp;rel=0" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" class="fr-draggable"></iframe></span><br/></div><p>Bartolome then filed a complaint with the labor arbiter at the National Labor Relations Commission which eventually ruled that he was constructively dismissed.</p><p>The Court of Appeals however reversed the ruling, finding that Bartolome voluntarily resigned and failed to prove his resignation was a result of coercion and intimidation.</p><p>But in reversing the CA decision, the Supreme Court held that the standard for constructive dismissal is whether a reasonable person in the employee’s position would have felt forced to give up their employment under the circumstances.</p><p>“Surely, the calculated and combined acts of TQAI President Lim, TQAI Group Retail Manager De Jesus, TQAI General Sales Manager Dela Paz, and Group Head Sobreviñas toward petitioner constitute acts of disdain and hostile behavior, supporting the conclusion that they were collectively easing out petitioner who consequently had no choice but leave his employment,” the court said in the decision penned by Associate Justice Amy Lazaro-Javier.</p><p>The court noted that in the defense of the company and its officials, Bartolome’s letter of resignation left no doubt that he voluntarily resigned.</p><p>But the court said it was not convinced, citing the Supreme Court decision on Torred vs. ICCP penned by Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo which stated that constructive dismissal is a dismissal in disguise.</p><p>“As discussed, petitioner&#x27;s resignation was brought about by respondents&#x27; acts of disdain and hostility toward him, rendering his continued employment with respondents impossible, nay unbearable,” the court said.</p><div><span class="fr-video fr-deletable fr-fvc fr-dvb fr-draggable" contenteditable="false" draggable="true"><iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/s-Q0Ouv7Y18?&amp;wmode=opaque&amp;rel=0" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" class="fr-draggable"></iframe></span><br/></div>

<p> The Supreme Court held that the standard for constructive dismissal is whether a reasonable person in the employee’s position would have felt forced to give up their employment under the circumstances.</p>

The Supreme Court held that the standard for constructive dismissal is whether a reasonable person in the employee’s position would have felt forced to give up their employment under the circumstances.

Quiet firing? SC says hostile behavior toward a worker constitutes constructive dismissal

News

Entertainment

Lifestyle

Sports

Metro.Style

More

Sudoku

Word of the Day

Lotto

Horoscope

Business

Quiet firing? SC says hostile behavior toward a worker constitutes constructive dismissal

Adrian Ayalin,

ABS-CBN News

Published September 27, 2024 03:02 PM PHT

Read More:

ABSNews

labor rights

Supreme Court

constructive dismissal

illegal dismissal

quiet firing

ABS-CBN Newsletter

Your go-to source for the latest news, entertainment highlights, exclusive interviews, and updates on your favorite Kapamilya stars.

ABS-CBN Newsletter

Your go-to source for the latest news, entertainment highlights, exclusive interviews, and updates on your favorite Kapamilya stars.

Sign Up

I have read and agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

ABS-CBN is the leading media and entertainment company in the Philippines, offering quality content across TV, radio, digital, and film. Committed to public service and promoting Filipino values, ABS-CBN continues to inspire and connect audiences worldwide.

Corporate

Investors

Governance

International Distribution

Corporate

Governance

Investors

International Distribution

NPC Seal of Registration

Privacy Policy

AI Policy

Terms of Service

Advertise with Us

© 2026 ABS-CBN Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

NPC Seal of Registration

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

AI Policy

Advertise with Us

© 2026 ABS-CBN Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

NPC Seal of Registration

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

AI Policy

Advertise with Us

© 2026 ABS-CBN Corporation. All Rights Reserved.