De Lima ordered to answer disbarment raps | ABS-CBN
ADVERTISEMENT

Welcome, Kapamilya! We use cookies to improve your browsing experience. Continuing to use this site means you agree to our use of cookies. Tell me more!
De Lima ordered to answer disbarment raps
De Lima ordered to answer disbarment raps
Ina Reformina,
ABS-CBN News
Published Jan 10, 2017 04:09 PM PHT

MANILA - The Supreme Court (SC) has directed Senator Leila De Lima to respond to a new disbarment case filed against her by a certain Atty. Fernando P. Perito.
MANILA - The Supreme Court (SC) has directed Senator Leila De Lima to respond to a new disbarment case filed against her by a certain Atty. Fernando P. Perito.
De Lima was given ten days to file her comment to the complaint-affidavit of Perito.
De Lima was given ten days to file her comment to the complaint-affidavit of Perito.
No details are available as to the nature of the disbarment case. The SC observes strict confidentiality in the handling of such administrative case.
No details are available as to the nature of the disbarment case. The SC observes strict confidentiality in the handling of such administrative case.
No details on complainant Perito are also available, although a certain Fernando Perito also filed a disbarment case against Davao City Mayor Sara Duterte in July 2011 for punching trial court sheriff Abe Andres for refusing to grant her request for a 2-hour extension on the enforcement of a demolition order in her city.
No details on complainant Perito are also available, although a certain Fernando Perito also filed a disbarment case against Davao City Mayor Sara Duterte in July 2011 for punching trial court sheriff Abe Andres for refusing to grant her request for a 2-hour extension on the enforcement of a demolition order in her city.
ADVERTISEMENT
At least two separate disbarment cases are pending with the SC against De Lima:
At least two separate disbarment cases are pending with the SC against De Lima:
(1) involving her defiance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued by the high court on the powers of the justice secretary to issue watch list orders, in connection with the case of former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo; and,
(1) involving her defiance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued by the high court on the powers of the justice secretary to issue watch list orders, in connection with the case of former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo; and,
(2) pertaining to her illicit affair with her married driver-bodyguard Ronnie Dayan.
(2) pertaining to her illicit affair with her married driver-bodyguard Ronnie Dayan.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT